3/17/22 The publication that should be fuming right now is the New York Post. In October 2020, the Post ran with the story of a would-be President's son who, at a Delaware (hmm, Delaware) repair shop, abandoned his laptop computer filled with photos and emails which spoke, rather graphically in many instances, to the character and business dealings of the owner and those in his orbit. They say "the apple doesn't fall far from the tree" and as such revelations by The Post, which appeared well-documented but might have adversely affected Joe Biden's chances of winning the grand prize, were, in large measure, quashed by "mainstream media" and banned by social media moguls. The material was labeled "Russian disinformation." ... of course. Problem was, all those pictures on the laptop of the would-be President's son ... could they all have been faked by Russians?

3/17/22 Forgive the profanity, but you have got to be s--tting us. First, the New York Times decides more than a year later that Hunter Biden's business woes are worthy of a story. Then, deep in the piece, in passing, it notes that Hunter's laptop is legitimate.

3/17/22 Big Tech, the corrupt corporate media, and Democrats throttled the completely legitimate Hunter Biden laptop story one month before the November 2020 election by lying that the reporting was Russian disinformation.